By Colin Robertson

November 6, 2026

Based on remarks to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development November 5, 2026 concerning its study of the opportunities presented to Canada and Canadians through a strengthened relationship with the European Union.

Canada does not need another argument about what to call its relationship with Europe. It needs more customers, stronger industries and greater freedom to make its own decisions.

That is why the recent Canada-EU Montreal summit matters. “Associate membership” and “Alliance for the Future” are labels. The strategic opportunity is to combine Canadian and European strengths in ways neither can achieve alone.

Canada’s turn towards Europe and the Indo-Pacific is foresight. Geography, history and market size bind us to the United States. Diversification strengthens our position within that reality.

The numbers impose discipline. In 2025, the EU took 6.7 per cent of Canada’s goods-and-services exports and supplied 10.6 per cent of our imports. The corresponding American shares were 67.2 and 57.8 per cent. Europe cannot replace that relationship.

But the EU already exceeds China, Britain, Mexico and Japan in two-way goods-and-services trade. Canadian exports to the EU reached $67.7 billion, against $61.2 billion to Britain, $44.7 billion to China, $16.9 billion to Japan and $13.2 billion to Mexico. These Global Affairs Canada figures show both Europe’s importance and the distance still to travel.

The larger opportunity is geopolitical.

Canada can help build coalitions of democracies able to defend their interests when great powers weaponize dependence. Europe can develop forms of association beyond full membership, becoming a stronger centre of attraction in a fractured world. Arrangements developed with Canada could offer a model for Britain, Australia, Japan and others.

This is variable geometry with a purpose: partners contributing where their interests and capabilities align.

The Expert Group on Canada–U.S. Relations makes that case in A Middle Power Charter for a Troubled World. Defending democracy, resisting coercion and pooling capabilities give individual agreements a common purpose.

Montreal supplied practical substance. The communiqué records substantive agreement on digital-trade negotiations, welcomes Canadian participation in European high-performance computing and advances investment cooperation with the European Investment Bank.

Canada’s existing association with Horizon Europe’s research pillar provides a foundation for deeper scientific collaboration. Planned negotiations on Erasmus+ and access to Galileo services could broaden educational opportunities and space cooperation. These are opportunities requiring follow-through, not benefits already universally available.

Canada’s turn towards Europe and the Indo-Pacific is foresight. Geography, history and market size bind us to the United States. Diversification strengthens our position within that reality.

Joint work on secure cables, computing and communications could reduce technological vulnerabilities. Critical minerals, energy and defence production offer complementary strengths. Cooperation in the Arctic and support for Ukraine connect industrial capacity to shared security.

But Europe is no frictionless promised land.

The single market still contains national rules and administrative differences. Exporters must navigate how requirements are interpreted and enforced in individual member states. Canada has raised concerns about labelling initiatives in France and Spain. Agreement in Brussels does not automatically settle every difficulty at the border.

Beef is the warning. CETA opened preferential access, but regulatory requirements have left quotas persistently underused. Canadian producers have long challenged European restrictions on carcass treatments and the expense of adapting processing to European requirements, describing the resulting costs as undermining commercial viability.

Europe is entitled to protect food safety. Canada is entitled to demand that requirements be scientifically justified, proportionate, and consistently administered. Protectionism dressed as regulation still blocks trade. Ottawa should pursue recognition of equivalent outcomes, without demanding identical systems.

The answer is more engagement, backed by harder bargaining.

First, make CETA work. Identify the costliest barriers, assign responsible officials and publish deadlines. Help smaller firms navigate certification, procurement and professional qualifications. Governments open doors; businesses must enter.

Second, make reciprocity tangible. European investment should support Canadian mineral processing, energy infrastructure and defence production. Canadian firms need access to European contracts and supply chains. Preferences favouring domestic industry must accommodate trusted partners reciprocally.

Policy coordination matters. Buy Canadian preferences and EU deforestation rules should not inadvertently penalize trusted partners. Design complementary policies and consult before imposing new burdens. Canadians should see the payoff: more jobs, investment, affordable goods and services through fewer trade barriers, and opportunities for students and researchers. Strategic ambition must translate into everyday gains for people.

Canada must also deliver reliable supplies, predictable approvals and credible projects. Partnership cannot compensate for paralysis at home.

Third, give Parliament a job beyond applauding summits. Require an implementation plan within six months, annual reporting and ministerial appearances. Scrutinize costs, regulatory obligations, dispute settlement, and Canada’s influence over decisions. Involve provinces, Indigenous partners and industry early.

Parliamentarians should cultivate European counterparts and build support across party lines. Businesses and universities need confidence that cooperation will survive the next election.

Success should be measured in contracts, investment, research partnerships and usable capabilities.

As Prime Minister Carney put it in Montreal: “Above all, this is about sovereignty. Our ability to live our lives as we wish.”

Sovereignty requires choices. Choices require capacity. Europe offers Canada a serious opportunity to build both.

Contributing Writer Colin Robertson, C.M., C.D, a former career diplomat, is a fellow and host of the Global Exchange podcast with the Canadian Global Affairs Institute in Ottawa.